<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hunt for Great Web Marketing Copy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/</link>
	<description>Blogging From Inside the New Media Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:26:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-4304</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smibs.com/?p=977#comment-4304</guid>
		<description>@Justin

I take your point - what I meant by my disagreement with the whole &quot;anti-intellectual&quot; thing was that the audience being targeted by Web 2.0 marketing copy isn&#039;t somehow less demanding. Like you say, it is precisely their &quot;intellectual&quot; or &quot;professional&quot; occupation and demands that necessitates simplified web copy.

As far as your &quot;web copy picks,&quot; I couldn&#039;t agree more! 37 Signals is an &quot;inspiration&quot; of mine when it comes to web marketing. I love the look and feel of their websites, and their copy is informative while somehow remaining conversational and &quot;cool&quot; for lack of better expression. I&#039;m excited to check out your non-profit copy suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Justin</p>
<p>I take your point &#8211; what I meant by my disagreement with the whole &#8220;anti-intellectual&#8221; thing was that the audience being targeted by Web 2.0 marketing copy isn&#8217;t somehow less demanding. Like you say, it is precisely their &#8220;intellectual&#8221; or &#8220;professional&#8221; occupation and demands that necessitates simplified web copy.</p>
<p>As far as your &#8220;web copy picks,&#8221; I couldn&#8217;t agree more! 37 Signals is an &#8220;inspiration&#8221; of mine when it comes to web marketing. I love the look and feel of their websites, and their copy is informative while somehow remaining conversational and &#8220;cool&#8221; for lack of better expression. I&#8217;m excited to check out your non-profit copy suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Urban</title>
		<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-4249</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smibs.com/?p=977#comment-4249</guid>
		<description>@Adrian

I agree that the influence of video will increase, especially for subjects &#039;push&#039; marketing activities where the style of the video (entertaining, funny, surprising ...) can entice people to watch through an underlying message or trasner of more complex knowledge. But I also agree with Forrest that written copy will stay as a important if not dominant form of communication.

I want to start experimenting with personal video blogging, so it&#039;ll be interesting to watch how that works for me as the &#039;author&#039; and for our audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adrian</p>
<p>I agree that the influence of video will increase, especially for subjects &#8216;push&#8217; marketing activities where the style of the video (entertaining, funny, surprising &#8230;) can entice people to watch through an underlying message or trasner of more complex knowledge. But I also agree with Forrest that written copy will stay as a important if not dominant form of communication.</p>
<p>I want to start experimenting with personal video blogging, so it&#8217;ll be interesting to watch how that works for me as the &#8216;author&#8217; and for our audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy</title>
		<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-4248</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smibs.com/?p=977#comment-4248</guid>
		<description>Good point Alain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Alain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain Saffel</title>
		<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Saffel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smibs.com/?p=977#comment-4241</guid>
		<description>I agree that you should try to use fewer words to say what you need to say. People reading your copy don&#039;t have a lot of time so you need to get to the point quickly.

It does depend on your audience though. When you have a large, loyal audience they may indulge your rambling. 

It also depends on the purpose of the copy. Body text in a website does need to be to the point. Blogs can be lengthier.

Ultimately, if what you say has a lot of value to your audience, they may not care how long it takes to say it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that you should try to use fewer words to say what you need to say. People reading your copy don&#8217;t have a lot of time so you need to get to the point quickly.</p>
<p>It does depend on your audience though. When you have a large, loyal audience they may indulge your rambling. </p>
<p>It also depends on the purpose of the copy. Body text in a website does need to be to the point. Blogs can be lengthier.</p>
<p>Ultimately, if what you say has a lot of value to your audience, they may not care how long it takes to say it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-4240</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smibs.com/?p=977#comment-4240</guid>
		<description>I think that Demian Farnworth is right: writing for the web is probably more like doing ad copy than writing an essay.  In that sense, it is &quot;anti-intellectual.&quot;

In many ways, it&#039;s the fast pace of professionals that forces the copy to lack the depth and verbosity of an &quot;intellectual&quot; article.  People want their information, and they want it in small, easy to digest morsels that they can devour on the spot.  In France they enjoy a two hour meal; in North America we want fast food.  The same goes with copy.

Web copy I like:

Corporate:
37signals - http://www.37signals.com
Apple - http://www.apple.com/getamac/whymac/
Hover - https://www.hover.com

Non-profit:
Housing Works - http://www.housingworks.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Demian Farnworth is right: writing for the web is probably more like doing ad copy than writing an essay.  In that sense, it is &#8220;anti-intellectual.&#8221;</p>
<p>In many ways, it&#8217;s the fast pace of professionals that forces the copy to lack the depth and verbosity of an &#8220;intellectual&#8221; article.  People want their information, and they want it in small, easy to digest morsels that they can devour on the spot.  In France they enjoy a two hour meal; in North America we want fast food.  The same goes with copy.</p>
<p>Web copy I like:</p>
<p>Corporate:<br />
37signals &#8211; <a href="http://www.37signals.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.37signals.com</a><br />
Apple &#8211; <a href="http://www.apple.com/getamac/whymac/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/getamac/whymac/</a><br />
Hover &#8211; <a href="https://www.hover.com" rel="nofollow">https://www.hover.com</a></p>
<p>Non-profit:<br />
Housing Works &#8211; <a href="http://www.housingworks.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.housingworks.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-4236</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smibs.com/?p=977#comment-4236</guid>
		<description>I totally agree, Christy. I think a lot of governmental and non-profit copy totally misses the point - it almost feels sometimes like they are trying to establish some kind of authority through the inaccessibility of their websites! At some point I&#039;d really like to blog about what non-profit copy can learn from corporate marketing copy, and visa versa. Selling is selling, whether your item is a product or a concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, Christy. I think a lot of governmental and non-profit copy totally misses the point &#8211; it almost feels sometimes like they are trying to establish some kind of authority through the inaccessibility of their websites! At some point I&#8217;d really like to blog about what non-profit copy can learn from corporate marketing copy, and visa versa. Selling is selling, whether your item is a product or a concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smibs.com/?p=977#comment-4235</guid>
		<description>I prefer copy over video. It may lack the initial flash and excitement factor, but it&#039;s faster to read a paragraph than have someone read it to you. Plus, I can skim boring parts and re-read slower parts. No fast forward, pause or rewind. I subscribe to 7 RSS feeds. If those were put into video format, it would take all day to get my news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer copy over video. It may lack the initial flash and excitement factor, but it&#8217;s faster to read a paragraph than have someone read it to you. Plus, I can skim boring parts and re-read slower parts. No fast forward, pause or rewind. I subscribe to 7 RSS feeds. If those were put into video format, it would take all day to get my news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Eden</title>
		<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-4234</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smibs.com/?p=977#comment-4234</guid>
		<description>I think as mobile network speeds increase, online video will be more important than text. Besides, what would you rather do, read a long article about business or see someone speak to your face for 1 minute about the same thing. Less time and more impact, in my humble opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think as mobile network speeds increase, online video will be more important than text. Besides, what would you rather do, read a long article about business or see someone speak to your face for 1 minute about the same thing. Less time and more impact, in my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy</title>
		<link>http://blog.smibs.com/posts/977/the-hunt-for-great-web-marketing-copy/comment-page-1/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smibs.com/?p=977#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>I think part of the &#039;magic formula&#039; is really knowing your audience and writing for them. I think a lot of government organizations really miss this point for example. Many government websites use tonnes of acronyms that their customer (citizens) aren&#039;t familiar with, they also use &#039;government speak&#039; as I like to call it, which includes all kinds of lingo that is not common knowledge. Websites shouldn&#039;t be about putting EVERYTHING you know/have online, it should be about having a good simple structure, writing such that you ensure clarity for your audience, and providing the most important documents/tools rather than going for quantity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the &#8216;magic formula&#8217; is really knowing your audience and writing for them. I think a lot of government organizations really miss this point for example. Many government websites use tonnes of acronyms that their customer (citizens) aren&#8217;t familiar with, they also use &#8216;government speak&#8217; as I like to call it, which includes all kinds of lingo that is not common knowledge. Websites shouldn&#8217;t be about putting EVERYTHING you know/have online, it should be about having a good simple structure, writing such that you ensure clarity for your audience, and providing the most important documents/tools rather than going for quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

